This section summarizes the activities in each of the LSAs as they relate to the GCIP Objectives and the significant characteristics of each LSA.
The LSA-SW has received high emphasis for the GCIP activities to date as was shown
in Figure 1-2 and will continue to receive a high emphasis through the end of Water Year
(WY) 1997. The LSA-NC (North Central) is added as a high emphasis area starting in the
WY 1997 with the LSA-E (East) added in WY 1998, and the LSA-NW added in WY 1999.
The CSA will have major emphasis during the three Water Years covered by this Major
Activities Plan.
7.1 LSA-SW
The geographical area of responsibility for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)-National Weather Service (NWS) River Forecast Center in Tulsa,
Oklahoma, is used to define the areas of the Arkansas-Red River basins for the LSA-SW.
For atmospheric modeling and other applications, a more regular-shaped area is defined by
the boundaries of 33 to 40N latitude and 91 to 107W longitude. This latitude-longitude
bounded area, shown in Figure 7-1, is referred to as the LSA-SW.
Figure 7-1 Latitude-longitude boundaries for LSA-SW encompassing the Arkansas-Red
River basin.
7.1.1 Significant Features in the LSA-SW
The large east-west gradients of climate variables, especially precipitation, coupled
with the unusually diverse mix of atmospheric and surface hydrological data were the
principal reasons for selecting the LSA-SW for the GCIP build-up period and the first two
years of the EOP. In addition to the large east-west variation in climate, four other
environmental features are significant:
The meteorological and hydrological networks covering the Mississippi River basin are
enhanced by new Weather Service Radar 88-Doppler (WSR-88D) radars, wind profilers, and
automatic weather stations. Enhancements to these observing networks are also available in
the form of mesoscale networks and the ARM Program at the southern Great Plains CART
facility (see Figure 7-1).
Commonality of research interests between GCIP, ARM, and ISLSCP forms the basis for unique observational and data analysis opportunities within the ARM/CART site. From the GCIP perspective, the ARM/CART site is large enough (almost 105 km2) and is well enough instrumented for approximate closure of the atmospheric energy and water budgets. The size of the ARM/CART area places it at the lower end of the LSA range. Therefore, some LSA studies can be done over the ARM/CART area as well as over the entire LSA-SW area.
Within the ARM/CART site, the opportunities to conduct ISA studies are numerous. At the ISA scale, precipitation and streamflow can be measured accurately and, although the areal average evapotranspiration and soil moisture cannot be measured, extensive in situ surface measurements related to evapotranspiration or soil moisture will be made as part of ARM, ISLSCP, the Oklahoma Mesonet, NOAA/NWS observations, and other programs such as CASES. The ARM/CART site also includes a range of climate, soils, and vegetation regimes and is therefore an attractive location for the development and validation of remote- sensing algorithms.
An example of an option for locating an SSA, where significant historical data are
available, is the Agriculture Research Service (ARS) Little Washita/Chickasha experimental
watershed. This watershed is on the southern boundary of the ARM/CART site (see Figure
7-1). It could be especially important in developing parameterizations of runoff, infiltration,
percolation, and soil moisture.
The full complement of observing systems needed for the Near-Surface Observation
Dataset, described in Section 10 are scheduled to be operating by the end of March 1997. A
second phase of data collection for this special data set will begin on 1 April 1997 and
continue for one full year. As in the first phase the data collection efforts will concentrate on
the ARM/CART site and the Little Washita Watershed.
The implementation strategy given in Volume II of the GCIP Implementation Plan
(IGPO, 1994a) envisioned that the LSA-SW activities will continue although at somewhat less
intensity beyond 1997. This continuing effort will provide GCIP investigators with a 5-yr data
set for the LSA-SW and with the same length data set for some of the ISAs and SSAs within
the area. The five years of effort in the LSA-SW will also enable the GCIP investigators to
benefit from this data rich subregion to the maximum extent possible during the EOP.
Figure 7-2 Latitude-longitude boundaries for LSA-NC encompassing the Upper
Mississippi River basin.
Appendix J - Summary of Results from Workshop on Cold-Season/Region
Hydrometeorology. A more complete summary report and proceedings for the
Workshop held in May 1995 at Banff, Alberta, Canada is also available (IGPO,
1995b).
Appendix K - Summary of Results from LSA-NC Detailed Design Workshop
Following this Detailed Design Workshop in Minneapolis, MN in October
1995, the GCIP Project set up a LSA-NC Science/Implementation Taskgroup to
take the results of these two workshops as initial input to recommend a specific
set of research activities which will best utilize the existing infrastructure and
other relevant research projects in the LSA-NC with due consideration of both
the future GCIP plans for research in other LSAs in the Mississippi River basin.
These results were used by a LSA-NC Science/Implementation Taskgroup to develop
recommendations for specific activities during WY'97.
The report of the LSA-NC Science/Implementation Taskgroup is given in Appendix A.
The Data Collection and Management (DACOM) Committee has used this Taskgroup report
as a basis for the Tactical Data Collection and Management Plan for the ESOP-97. The data
collection plans are described further in Section 12 which is in Part II of the GCIP Major
Activities Plan.
Figure 7-3 Latitude-longitude boundaries for LSA-E encompassing the Ohio and
Tennessee River basins.
A discussion paper was compiled by Dale Quattrochi as a precursor to the
GCIP/LSA-E Detailed Design Workshop held in November 1996 at Huntsville, AL. The
discussion paper presents both opportunities and challenges for conducting research to better
understand how hydrologic, atmospheric, and hydrometeorological processes are manifested
and operate in the eastern portion of the Mississippi River basin. The LSA-E region offers an
opportunity to compare and contrast hydrologic processes operating within a temperate, humid
climatic region, with the same processes operating in very different climatic environments in
the LSA-SW, NC and NW. The comparative differences with the other three LSAs offers an
opportunity to learn something about the atmospheric-hydrologic linkages within the GCIP
region as well as to extend and validate the methods and models used in the LSA-SW and
LSA-NC to the LSA-E. Moreover, the LSA-E provides a challenging environment to develop
and test nested modeling approaches for addressing atmospheric, hydrologic,
hydrometeorologic, and land surface scaling issues. The LSA-E region also offers the
opportunity to address the human dimensions of climate change on hydrology within the
Mississippi River basin, particularly those impacts associated with the operational or long-
term management of water resources.
The workshop recommended a number of research activities that should be
accomplished in the LSA-E as major contributors to the successful accomplishment of the
GCIP Science Objectives. In particular, the hydrometeorological prediction and water
resources management group recommended a set of experimental activities for both the Ohio
and Tennessee River basins as given in Section 3. A summary report of the LSA-E Detailed
Design Workshop is given in Appendix B. This report will form the basis for the definition
of specific implementation tasks to be carried out during Water Years 1998 and 1999.
The LSA-NW offers an excellent test of the transferability of developed models and retrieval
algorithms from the other three LSAs. The transferability of results is a very significant issue
in determining the success of GCIP results with respect to worldwide applications and to
climate modeling on a global scale.
Figure 7-4 Latitude-longitude boundaries for LSA-NW encompassing the Missouri
River basin.
The CSA data requirements in the early years of the EOP are primarily for the
application of energy and water budget studies with a secondary application of model
evaluation for the regional model output .
The specific CSA activities during 1998 and 1999 will depend upon the support for
regional activities in the LSA-E and the LSA-NW during these years. Some early plans are
being formulated for a Mississippi River Basin Experiment (MIRBEX) starting as early as
1999. These plans will be further developed after the LSA-E and LSA-NW research support
issues are better defined.
7.1.2 LSA-SW Activities during WY'97-WY'99
Since 1993, GCIP has been working in cooperation with other projects and activities
in the Arkansas-Red River basin to compile integrated data sets. These include the
Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement(ARM) program, the Department
of Agriculture/Agriculture Research Service and the U.S. Geological Survey Mapping and
Water Resources Divisions. GCIP has also supported enhancements to existing observation
networks to obtain observations crucial for studying and modeling land surface processes and
the coupling of these processes with the atmosphere. The support for soil moisture and soil
temperature profile measurements in the Southern Great Plains ARM/CART site and the
Little Washita Watershed is particularly noteworthy.
7.2 LSA-NC
The second year of the EOP in WY 1997 marks the start of focused studies within the
Upper Mississippi River basin, identified as LSA-NC (see Figure 7-2). This LSA extends
into southern Canada and will provide an opportunity for cooperative efforts with the
Canadian GEWEX Program. A regular-shaped area is defined by the boundaries of 37 to
50N and 85 to 99W longitude as shown in Figure 7-2.
7.2.1 Characteristics of the LSA-NC
The features important to GCIP in this LSA include the following:
Cold-season hydrology involves consideration of the dormant state of vegetation, the
nature of evaporation-sublimation loss, the effect of soil conditions (especially frozen soil) on
runoff, infiltration, and most importantly, the snow cycle. A prerequisite for the improvement
of the parameterization of snow hydrological processes is an improved database of relevant
variables. A program for improved documentation of snow cover, water content, and albedo
over the LSA-NC will exploit all available information from in situ, aircraft, and satellite
observations from the region. The SSAs to be established within the Upper Mississippi River
basin for study will provide additional data on the vertical variation of snow thermal
properties and on the hydrological and thermal conditions of the underlying soil layer that are
relevant to the development of improved snow hydrology and soil moisture parameterizations.
Several locations are candidates for an SSA in the LSA-NC. The USGS operates an
interdisciplinary research institute for hydrological research in the Shingobel River headwaters
area of northern Minnesota. The USDA/ARS operates an experimental station in Morris,
Minnesota and the University of Minnesota operates an experimental agriculture area near St.
Paul, Minnesota. Other areas include the Illinois Climate Network operated by the Illinois
State Water Survey.
7.2.2 LSA-NC Activities during WY'97-'WY'99
The Major Activities Plan for 1996, 1997, and Outlook for 1998 for GCIP (IGPO,
1995a) contained two appendices relevant to planning for research in the LSA-NC:
7.3 LSA-E
Focused studies within the Ohio River basin, identified as LSA-E (see Figure 7-3) will
be emphasized by GCIP starting in the third year of the EOP. This LSA extends eastward to
encompass most of the Appalachian Mountains. A regular-shaped area is defined by the
boundaries 30-45 N. latitude and 78 to 89 W. Longitude.
7.3.1 Characteristics of the LSA-E
The features important to GCIP in this LSA include the following:
The characteristics of the major river basins in the LSA-E are:
7.3.2 LSA-E Activities during WY'98-WY'99
In preparation for this new focus study region, NASA scientists at the Marshall Space
Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama worked with scientists from neighboring institutions to
organize some GCIP-related activities in the Tennessee Valley region. Focus of the work is
on establishing a SSA within the Tennessee Valley region and defining the important
hydrometeorological, biophysical and landscape science issues that need to be addressed to
support GCIP activities within this SSA. Foremost will be to expand cooperative
relationships between institutions such as the Global Hydrology Climate Center (GHCC), the
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to better
draw upon the rich data and science expertise resources available within the Tennessee Valley
region for conducting GCIP-related investigations within the LSA-E. One of the real
advantages in working in the Tennessee Valley is the ability to explore the interrelationships
of GCIP science issues with the applied interests of the TVA in reservoir operations,
management, and electric power production.
7.4 LSA-NW
The LSA-NW encompassing the Missouri River basin is the fourth and last LSA for
focused studies in the Mississippi River basin . This region was the last to receive the WSR-
88D radar systems and also is the most data sparse region in the Mississippi River basin.
7.4.1 Significant Features in the LSA-NW
The general characteristics of this region, especially the northwestern portion is that it
is snowmelt dominated and is mostly semi-arid. Some important characteristics are thin
winter snowpacks and short vegetation amenable to aircraft and satellite remote sensing .
Additional features important to GCIP in this LSA include the following:
. Large year to year variability in water cycle components.
A regular shaped area is defined by the boundaries of 40 to 51 N latitude and 95 to 115 W
longitude as shown in Figure 7-4.
. Significant regulation of steamflow through dams .
. Major terrain effect from Rocky Mountains.
. Relatively small normal runoff amounts.
. Snow measurement a significant problem.
. Snowmelt timing as problem in water budget regions.
. Nebraska sandhill as unique hydrology problem.
7.4.2 LSA-NW Activities Outlook for WY'99
An early start on planning and proposing GCIP relevant studies in the Upper Missouri
River basin is being made by a group led by the South Dakota Schools of Mines and
Technology. This group is proposing a long-term plan for a collaborative research project to
integrate scientific resources in the Upper Missouri River basin to address questions of
fundamental importance related to hydrology, land cover, exchange processes, climate
variability, and sustainability. The goal of the proposed effort is to monitor, describe, explain
and predict seasonal and interannual variations of land cover and precipitation over the Upper
Missouri River basin. The primary objective of the proposed research is to develop and
improve representations of atmospheric and land surface processes, and their interactions, in
coupled system models that simulate the major hydrologic processes of concern over the
basin. The central hypothesis of the investigation is that variations in atmospheric circulations
and land-surface characteristics are mutually interactive and can generate significant variations
of weather and climate in the region on temporal scales up to seasonal and interannual.
NOTE to Draft - The Group preparing the proposal summarized above is preparing to submit
the proposal to NASA for funding. Given that this proposal is supported it is likely that the
research proposed could start as early as 1997.
7.5 CSA Activities for 1997 to 1999
The implementation of GCIP research is focusing initially on sub-basins of the
Mississippi River basin leading to an integrated continental-scale capability by the end of the
five year enhanced observing period in the year 2000.