Goal: Develop a coupled hydrologic/atmospheric model with an initial validation focus on the Mississippi River basin at a time scale of days to seasons increasing to an interannual time scale.
In the context of the GCIP, a coupled atmospheric-hydrologic model is defined to be a
model or combination of models which simultaneously represents both atmospheric and
hydrological processes, which can operate in predictive mode without the need to specify
variables or exchanges at the interface between the two model components, and which can benefit
from the assimilation of data to specify that interface.
2.1 General Approach
The implementation of model development in GCIP has followed two paths as described
in the GCIP Implementation Plan (IGPO, 1993) and was shown in
Figure 1-3. On the "research"
path are the longer term modeling and analysis activities needed to achieve the GCIP coupled
modeling objective:
Develop and evaluate coupled hydrologic/atmospheric models at resolutions appropriate to large scale continental basins.
Research is focusing on determining , understanding and modeling those processes which are demonstrably important in coupling atmospheric and hydrological systems, rather than those processes which are separately important within these two systems. A GCIP Coupled Modeling Workshop held in May 1996 resulted in a number of recommendations which are incorporated in this and other sections of the Major Activities Plan for 1997, 1998 and Outlook for 1999.
An "operational" path was started in 1993 during in the GCIP Buildup Phase to develop and implement the improvements needed in the operational analysis and prediction schemes to produce the model assimilated and forecast output products for GCIP research, especially for energy and water budget studies. The regional mesoscale models also serve to test components of a regional climate model and can provide output for the evaluation of a coupled hydrologic/atmospheric model during the assimilation and early prediction time periods as a precursor to developing and testing a coupled hydrologic/atmospheric climate model. The output from three different regional mesoscale models is routinely compiled as part of the GCIP data set as described in section 11 of this plan.
The activities for each of these paths are described in the remainder of this section.
(b) interpret predictions of weather and climate in terms of water resources at all
time scales.
2.2 Coupled Modeling Research
The GCIP coupled modeling research is predicated on the hypothesis that the creation of
regional-scale coupled models which simultaneously represent both relevant atmospheric and the
land-surface processes, and the validation of these models against observations from GCIP, will
improve our ability to:
(a) predict variations in weather and climate at time scales up to interannual; and
In accordance with this hypothesis, GCIP is focusing on those research activities which create,
calibrate, and apply coupled models of the atmospheric and hydrologic systems with priority given
to research to improve climate prediction and to improve hydrological interpretation of
meteorological predictions at the above time scales. The GCIP coupled modeling research is
focusing on three program elements that address the three scientific questions and priority needs
given in Table 2-1. These issues and planned research activities are
described further in the following paragraphs.
1. "To what extent is meterological prediction at daily to seasonal time scales sensitive to
hydrologic-atmospheric coupling processes?" - the priority research issues to be
addressed by GCIP are:
For Soil Moisture Processes
For Biospheric Processes
The required studies will involve a combination of measurement and modeling activities.
Observations would likely include atmospheric profiles of moisture, temperature, and wind during
both warm and cool seasons and during the transition from cold to warm season, together with
simultaneous measurements of the surface fluxes of water and energy. Modeling studies could
include sensitivity studies using validated coupled models applied in different seasons and at
different spatial scales.
The extent to which short-term variations in surface energy balance require representation
in predictive models when applied at seasonal-to-interannual time scales merits more detailed
investigation. Modeling experiments are required to explore this limit on the complexity of the
representation of hydrologic-atmospheric processes.
There is opportunity to improve communication between atmospheric scientists and
hydrologists on this issue, because neither of these two groups have hitherto had opportunity to
fully appreciate the relevant capabilities of the other. Hydrologists do not yet appreciate what the
nature and form of seasonal-to-interannual meteorological predictions might be, and there is some
lack of clarity on this issue. Equally, meteorologists do not yet have an appreciation of what type
of seasonal-to-interannual prediction might have practical value to hydrologists. At this time,
therefore, the need is to provide better definition of these issues in order to establish a means of
interaction between the two communities.
Not only is GCIP in a strong position to foster experimental seasonal-to-interannual
forecasts focused on the North American continent, it is also uniquely able to provide effective
validation of such forecasts by virtue of the existing and new data that are being collected for the
U.S. in general, and for the Mississippi River basin in particular. However, some redefinition of
GCIP data products will be required. Specifically, once the form, nature, and spatial and temporal
scale of seasonal-to-interannual prediction products are defined, it will be necessary to synthesize
equivalent observational products from GCIP's precipitation and temperature measuring
networks. Future westerly extension of the GCIP study area also seems essential if there is to be
a better match between areas in the U.S., where seasonal-to-interannual prediction is most
feasible, and areas in which data collection within GCIP has priority. Arguably, the single-most
challenging technical problem will be providing a credible regional measurement of cold-season
precipitation for the purposes of comparison with seasonal-to-interannual predictions.
There is a need to develop better understanding of the requirements of the hydrological
community so that any predictive meteorological products provided at the seasonal-to-interannual
time scale can be tailored more precisely and the opportunities for timely application of GCIP
research within hydrology thus enhanced.
(1) Improved parameterization of convective precipitation in atmospheric models
Focused smaller-scale modeling studies are needed to investigate how to improve the
parameterization of convective precipitation within regional-scale atmospheric models. To have
credibility, such studies require experimental validation. Such experiments would involve
simultaneous measurements in the atmosphere and at the surface, and would need to be framed in
a proper regional context by specification of the atmospheric flow fields through the study area.
GCIP has already begun planning the provision of some of the required observations, in the form
of a Near-Surface Observation Data Set described in Section 12. GCIP is also fostering
opportunities to validate regional models of precipitation within the Mississippi River basin
through collaboration with other observational programs such as ARM, the US Weather Research
Program, and the GEWEX Cloud System Study as described in Section 8.
(2) Statistical analyses of sub-grid scale precipitation
Studies are needed to characterize the true variability of precipitation in space and time
and its relation with the state of the overlying atmosphere. Understanding the relationship
between actual continental precipitation and that predicted by atmospheric models is a very high
priority for GCIP. Such studies are especially important at hourly to daily time scales and at
spatial scales up to the area covered by a few grid intervals in mesoscale and large-scale
atmospheric models.
The accuracy with which precipitation can be measured (by gauges, radar, or both) is
likely to be an issue in such studies. Recognizing this last point, the LSA-SW would be the
appropriate initial focus for such studies since the stage 3, gauge-calibrated radar precipitation
products provided by the Arkansas-Red Basin River Forecast Center (ABRFC) now have
established value for comparison against modeled estimates using the Eta, MAPS and RFE
regional NWP models.
(3) Research into cold season precipitation issues
Snow is an important component of precipitation, particularly so in the northern and
western regions of the U.S., where it provides an important component of the available surface-water
resource. Many of the basic atmospheric parameterization issues are similar for warm and
cold season precipitation, though parameter values are likely to change between seasons.
However, there are additional important research issues related to quantifying cold season
precipitation and its partition into runoff or soil moisture which must be addressed as a priority in
GCIP. Such questions will be priority issues in the scientific agenda for GCIP studies in the LSA-NC.
The central question is how to develop precipitation volumes that give an accurate
measure of the temporal and spatial distribution of snowfall. Associated with this question is the
need to determine how representative are rain gauge measurements of snowfall and how to
combine surface observations of snow depth and with remote-sensing estimates from aircraft and
satellites. These questions of snowfall measurements are discussed further in Section 6.1. To
assess the amount and timing of water resources and the soil moisture available for subsequent
evaporation, it is also necessary to document, understand and model how the water is partitioned
into runoff and infiltration when snow and ice melts.
(4) Improved understanding of topographic influences on precipitation
Water is a critical resource in the western U.S. It occurs mainly through the winter season
and to a great extent depends on the total water vapor flux across the mountains and, hence, on
large-scale circulation in the atmosphere in winter. However, it is strongly influenced by
orography, and GCIP has the potential to make an important contribution to the improved
seasonal-to-interannual prediction of water resources in the western U.S. by improving the
predictability of orographic precipitation. Accurate forecasting of water resources requires better
definition of the location of precipitation than is possible with current weather forecast models.
The optimal spatial scale for these forecasts is around 2-3 km, but to achieve this would require a
nested modeling approach as an extension of presently available systems. Exploratory research is
required to evaluate the value of successively nested forecast models as a possible mechanism for
applying seasonal-to-interannual forecasts to water resource issues.
Heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of soil moisture is an inevitable consequence of
uneven precipitation, and this can be exacerbated by the subsequent flow of surface and
subsurface water across uneven topography. Preliminary modeling investigations (e.g. Avissar
and Liu, 1996) indicate that naturally occurring soil moisture heterogeneity (acting through
land-atmosphere coupling processes) significantly influences the behavior of the overlying atmosphere.
Progress in understanding the effect of area-average soil moisture, understanding the effect of
heterogeneity in soil moisture fields, and in validating models which describe the seasonal
evolution of soil moisture in space and time have all been curtailed by the historic (and still
current) lack of soil moisture measurements.
(1) Improved and extended soil moisture measurement
The growing deployment within GCIP of arrays of field systems capable of routine
measurement of soil moisture and the prospect of future deployment of aircraft- and space-borne
sensors capable of providing indirect measurements of near-surface soil wetness promise relief
from observational limits on understanding for soil moisture processes in coupled models.
Exploratory installation of automatic soil moisture sensors within the ARM-CART array is
underway, and plans are being made to extend deployment to the Oklahoma Mesonet and similar
distributed data collection networks elsewhere in the Mississippi River basin. GCIP has an
interest in deploying a set of soil moisture (and temperature) profile measurements along a
north-south transect in the North-Central study area to make observations over the annual cycle, but
with emphasis on documenting freezing and thawing episodes during the cold season.
Meanwhile, there is investigation of the value of installing soil moisture measurements along a
transect from the Little Washita watershed in Oklahoma to the Shingobee watershed in northern
Minnesota. Pending these new data sources, the Illinois state water survey soil moisture data
(Hollinger and Icard, 1994) remain a valuable data resource for GCIP. The distribution of soil
moisture data from these new arrays of soil moisture sensors to the GCIP coupled modeling
community is a high priority, as is their synthesis into regional products for model initiation and
calibration purposes. A more detailed description of the soil moisture measurement and analysis
is given in Section 6.2.
The GCIP community strongly supports the proposal to provide routine remotely sensed
measurements of soil moisture using a satellite L-band microwave radiometer. The community
understands that such observations can only provide indirect estimates of near-surface soil
wetness for certain vegetation covers, but also recognizes that these data are most reliable for
short-rooted and sparse vegetation where soil moisture control is most important. Routinely
provided soil wetness estimates from satellite could be exploited for coupled model initiation and
validation using four-dimensional data assimilation techniques to improve the prospect of better
seasonal climate predictions for North America. Moreover, GCIP provides a unique opportunity
to validate and calibrate remote-sensing soil moisture data because of the richness of other data
fields, such as WSR-88D and gauged rainfall, runoff, and modeled evaporation, from which
alternative area-average soil wetness estimates can be made. Calibration of remotely sensed soil
wetness data within the GCIP region could thus be the basis for their application elsewhere in the
world.
The potential availability of new sources of soil moisture data gives rise to the need to
determine how these data can best be used to initiate and validate coupled models. Research is
required to investigate how to use sample data from arrays of surface measurements and
exploratory remote-sensing data from airborne radiometers. Some modeling studies have been
done, but with very limited field validation. Properly conceived combined field and modeling
studies would greatly illuminate this issue. The coupled modeling community is aware of and
applauds upcoming NASA-sponsored field studies within the ARM-CART study area in the
Mississippi River basin that fulfill many of these observational needs, and look forward to
working with the data that will result (see next section).
(2) Coupled modeling of the effect of soil moisture heterogeneity on the atmosphere
The opportunity exists to run fine-scale, nested grid, microscale (large-eddy simulation)
models that can resolve clouds and the resulting precipitation fields in the context of the
upcoming observational studies just described. These model results (considered in a statistical
sense) can be compared with the airborne sensor and ground soil moisture observations and with
radar and gauged rainfall measurements to determine the quality of the model simulation.
An alternative approach to coupled modeling is to assume that precipitation and other
atmosphere processes cannot be predicted deterministically and to conceive models that provide
statistical representation of these processes. The challenge is then to develop complementary
hydrological models that can be forced with statistical distributions of meteorological variables
such as precipitation, solar radiation, etc., and to use these to calculate statistical estimates of the
feedback to the atmosphere in the form of sensible-heat and latent-heat fluxes, etc. Statistical
models of this type would also benefit from validation against the statistical distributions of
precipitation and soil moisture observed in the upcoming observational studies discussed above.
An important aspect of coupled modeling research concerns the possible importance of
soil moisture on the formation and evolution of mesoscale convective complexes (MCCs) and
mesoscale convective systems (MCSs). Such large mesoscale systems are often initiated over
mountainous terrain and move eastward, and they produce a significant portion of warm season
precipitation in the Mississippi River basin. Current studies in the western Mississippi River basin
need to take account of these mesoscale systems because they play a major role in the warm
season hydrological cycle in the southeastern Mississippi River basin. Fine-scale modeling studies
are required to ensure adequate simulation of MCCs and to investigate their relation to the
underlying soil moisture fields in the regional NWP models. Again, these studies would be best
linked to upcoming observational initiatives. After accurate trial simulation of MCCs is
accomplished in these particular situations, model tests of the effect of MCCs on the regional
hydrology can be made under varying soil moisture conditions.
(3) Improved parameterization of hydrologic submodels
Model parameter estimation is closely tied to model development. Model parameters in
the hydrologic part of coupled models vary spatially and may also vary seasonally. Local model
parameters are estimated on the basis of information about vegetation, soils and geology, and
gridded fields of soils and vegetation characteristics are needed at various scales to provide such
estimates. Many such gridded maps have been developed for the GCIP study area, but this
process needs to continue. Procedures for estimating model parameters from these gridded data
have been developed and have been used to calculate distributed fields of model parameters for
some schemes, but the parameter estimation procedures used are largely untested, and it is known
that there are wide margins of uncertainty in the ensuing estimates of parameters, such as rooting
depth and the hydraulic characteristics of soils. Because model performance is highly sensitive to
the value of these parameters, validation and improvement of methods for parameter estimation
are needed. Hydrologic schemes might be improved by selecting a model structure which
minimizes the effect of parameter uncertainty on model output. There are already a wide range of
models available, and the Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes
(PILPS) has shown that the available schemes can indeed produce a wide range of different
results, given the same parameterization data. No doubt part of this difference is due to model
structure differences, but part is due to the way model parameters are estimated from the same
basic parameterization data.
One factor which limits tests of the credibility of model parameter estimation techniques is
the fact that validation data are not readily available. However, streamflow data can be used
together with observations of precipitation and estimates of meteorological forcing from surface
observations to validate the performance of hydrologic models and, hence, the procedures used to
select the parameters applied within them. As a possible GCIP initiative, historical data series of
these variables which last at least 10 years (to sample interannual variability) could be organized
for some river basins over a wide range of climatic settings, and these then could be made
available to the scientific community for the purpose of model parameter validation. Such data
could be used to test the parameter estimation schemes used in a selection of hydrologic models
as a precursor to their possible inclusion in coupled models.
A general approach and overall strategy for parameter estimation and testing as a
precursor to coupled model experiments is illustrated in Figure 2-1.
This figure is a process
diagram that illustrates how activities fit together to produce the primary outputs expected from
the off-line experiments. Locations of the primary outputs are shown in
Figure 2-1. These primary outputs are:
Figure 2-1 Strategy for Coupled Model Experiments.
The parameter estimation strategy will be to build on existing experience with a priori
parameter estimation using available land surface characteristics information, previous
investigations of "effective" parameters that account for sub-grid variability of the actual
parameters, and parameter calibration techniques that have been developed by the hydrology
modeling community. As illustrated in Figure 2-1, this strategy involves beginning with existing a
priori parameter estimates, using them in test watersheds to see how well they function over
many years. The primary variable for the long term tests will be runoff, but soil moisture and
surface flux data are available for limited periods at a few places. Adjustments can be made in the
a priori parameters to get improved model performance. The basis for these adjustments might
include theoretical analyses of scaling relationships or analyses of parameter sensitivity and
uncertainty. Then, new relationships (some may be empirical) between adjusted parameter values
and climate, soils and vegetation characteristics that can be known globally will be developed.
These will be applied to other test watersheds and evaluated.
The International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) has proposed
NASA-sponsored observations and modeling studies to define the coupling between the biosphere
and atmosphere across the GCIP study area. Long-term and continuous measurements of mass
and energy fluxes and planetary boundary-layer characteristics are proposed for selected sites in
the GCIP domain. These continuous tower-based measurements will allow documentation of
diurnal, seasonal, and interannual variations in surface energy fluxes and PBL growth and also
capture unexpected but important meteorological events such as drought and storms. The
proposed sites would be established over representative land surfaces in the GCIP domain, such
as crops, rangeland, and broadleaf forests. They will provide information on meteorological and
biological variables needed to test and parameterize the soil-vegetation-atmosphere models which
will be the repository of understanding of biosphere-atmosphere coupling in this ISLSCP
initiative. Flux measurements at individual tower sites measure surface fluxes only over a limited
upwind area and would be augmented with short-term studies over a larger area to determine how
representative the towers are. Experimental campaigns with instrumented aircraft are the
proposed mechanism to assess the spatial statistics associated with surface characteristics and
with surface energy fluxes.
A hierarchy of models, including the most advanced biosphere-atmosphere models
currently available, would then be tested against these observations. These would be used as the
basis for developing simpler, mechanistically-based models that can be implemented by forecast
meteorologists, hydrologists, and climatologists. Scientific foci of this proposed ISLSCP study
would be the better determination of seasonality in leaf cover and ensuing changes in biospheric
parameters; the biospheric response to seasonal changes in atmospheric demand, with particular
attention to changes in the response of vegetation in extreme conditions; and the extension of
current understanding on biospheric processes to the dominant land covers within the GCIP
domain. Such scientific issues are important aspects of the GCIP coupled modeling research
agenda, and the recent Coupled Modeling Workshop strongly supported this NASA-sponsored
initiative.
The regional mesoscale models are supporting GCIP research in the following manner:
NCEP, over the last three years with GCIP support, has accelerated ETA/EDAS
improvements in the following three key areas:
- October 1995: Realtime, routine assimilation of SSM/I total column water vapor over
oceans in the EDAS.
- January 1996: The new NCEP/OSU land-surface package was implemented, with two
soil layers, time-dependent soil moisture, seasonally varying vegetation, and snowpack
(Chen et al., 1996a, Chen et al., 1996b, Betts et al., 1996, (Janjic, 1994).
- May 1996: Realtime generation and archive of National Stage IV gage/radar hourly 4-km
precipitation analysis (an important prerequsite for assimilation of precipitation in the
EDAS).
The following is a list of ongoing GCIP-focused ETA/EDAS developments now
underway with a projected implementation in the next 24 months or less:
The current ETA/EDAS system operates at a resolution of 48-km and 38 layers. The
companion mesoscale Eta system operates on a 29-km resolution with 50 layers. Routine realtime
testing of 10-km nested Eta grids (Eastern U.S.) was successfully accomplished for 4 months
during May-Aug 96 in a special Olympic support effort. Once-a-day prototype 10-km nested Eta
runs are expectedto continue at NCEP as a demonstration of concept to be evaluated by NWS
field forecasters.
Surface temperature and wind forecasts should become slightly more accurate due to
modifications to the surface layer formulation which will affect the free convection limit and the
roughness length. More realistic surface temperature and dew point predictions should result
from refined treatments of surface evaporation, snow melt, and soil humidity analysis over North
America. A 35-km resolution version of the model with 28 vertical levels was implemented at the
end of 1995. Improvements are being tested for its stratiform clouds (the Sundqvist scheme with
explicit prediction of cloud fraction and cloud water) which are expected to have a significant
impact on precipitation and three-dimensional humidity forecasts. Energy budget calculations are
expected to benefit from more sophisticated solar and
infrared radiation parameterizations.
Within the coming year it is expected that a meso-scale convective parameterization
(perhaps Fritsch-Chappell) and a fully interactive radiation/cloud water scheme will become
available. The recent installation of a NEC SX-4 supercomputer should permit a further upgrade
of the model resolution to approximately 20 km, with a corresponding increase in the number of
vertical levels.
Table 2-1: Scientific Agenda Recommended by the GCIP Coupled Modeling Workshop
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. "To what extent can meteorological predictions be given hydrological interpretation?" -
the priority needs in GCIP are for:
3. "How can models of relevant hydrologic-atmospheric coupling processes be improved
to enhance meteorological and hydrological prediction?" - the priority needs for
GCIP are:
For Precipitation Processes
2.2.1 Atmospheric/Hydrologic Coupling Sensitivity
Progress in the representation of land-atmosphere interactions over the last two decades has
been sufficient to motivate several operational modeling centers (for example, the National Center
for Environmental Prediction, the European Centre for Medium Range Forecasting, and the
Japanese Meteorological Center) to implement and benefit from modern-era, multi-layer
soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer schemes. Planetary, continental, and regional atmospheric
circulation patterns in such assimilation systems are constrained near truth by the assimilation of
atmospheric observations. Nonetheless, the implementation of improved representation of
hydrologic-atmospheric interactions has undoubtedly improved the quality of the precipitation and
low-level temperature analysis products provided by data assimilation systems.
2.2.1.1 Seasonal Predictability Evidence and Mechanisms
GCIP provides an excellent rationale and data source for investigating the hypothesis, in the
context of North America, that (globally determined) soil moisture anomalies at the beginning of
the warm season influence the regional precipitation during the subsequent months. Atmospheric
general circulation model runs are required with improved representation of interactive moist
processes to test this hypothesis and to determine the conditions and limitations
under which it might apply. Diagnostic studies are also needed. These would involve
comprehensive analyses to explore the lagged correlation, both locally and perhaps downwind,
between all the relevant data (on rainfall, evaporation, temperature, clouds, radiation, vegetative
state, etc.) now available within GCIP.
2.2.1.2 Coupling importance over an annual cycle
The strength and influence of the hydrologic-atmospheric coupling varies between cool
and warm seasons, which leads to seasonal differences in the importance of land-atmosphere
coupling relative to other regional-scale and global-scale influences. Understanding this seasonal
variation will aid in defining the relative complexity required in the representation for different
hydrologic-atmospheric coupling processes when used for meteorological prediction. Land-atmosphere
coupling processes which are important in seasons when local controls are more
important likely need more precise representation than those which are important in seasons when
global-scale influences dominate.
2.2.1.3 Significance of diurnal variations in surface energy fluxes
Based on the results from a coupled land-atmosphere model, Koster and Suarez (1995)
suggested that large scale circulation is affected by short-term variability in the surface energy
balance. Hence a land surface scheme that realistically reproduces the mean diurnal cycle of the
surface energy balance may nonetheless be inadequate for coupled modeling purposes. The
scheme might also need to reproduce the short-term variations in the balance of energy.
2.2.2 Hydrological interpretation of meteorological predictions
The nature of the meteorological predictions calculated by global-scale models of the
ocean-atmosphere-land system is likely to be profoundly different from actual meteorological
observations in terms of their spatial and temporal precision and accuracy, even when those
predictions have been down-scaled through mesoscale, regional models. Existing hydrological
models are designed to work from observations, and their form and function reflect the nature of
these observations. Research is required to determine what type of hydrological prediction is
possible from seasonal-to-interannual meteorological predictions and at what spatial and temporal
scales hydrological interpretation can have worthwhile credibility and utility. Handling uncertainty
in meteorological predictions is not a resolved issue in hydrological models, even for short-term
forecasts, and reservoir management practice will always need to be incorporated into the
hydrological interpretation for North American water resource issues.
2.2.2.1 Exploratory seasonal-to-interannual predictions
Although there are unresolved scientific issues regarding the optimum representation of
physical processes in coupled hydrologic-atmospheric models, the viability of the land-surface
schemes presently being used at operational forecast centers is such that it is now time to
undertake experimental, free-running seasonal-to-interannual simulations with coupled models of
the land-atmosphere-ocean system to give global and regional forecasts. Realistically, early
expectations of skill should be limited to capturing modest indications of regional-scale monthly
or seasonal anomalies in precipitation and temperature.
2.2.2.2 Definition of the predictive products required by hydrologists
Resource managers within the hydrological community might be able to make use of a
range of predicted outputs from coupled land-atmosphere-ocean models, but hitherto they have
tended to rely on traditional meteorological and hydrological measurements applied to
conventional hydrological models for streamflow predictions. Although hydrologists have a good
capability for using statistical forecast information, so far the coupled modeling community has
not given priority to providing this type of information. However, research into the possible
hydrological interpretation of these predictions cannot begin until the nature and form of such
predictions are better defined.
2.2.3 Improved coupling processes - issues and actions
Accepting the hypothesis that better representation of processes in coupled
atmospheric-hydrologic models will yield improved meteorological prediction at all time scales, research is
required to determine, understand, and model such coupling processes. The focus of research
into several coupling processes might evolve in response to better specification. However,
initially, research will address improved representation of precipitation, soil moisture and
biospheric processes.
2.2.3.1 Precipitation processes
Clouds and their associated precipitation are important in the global water and energy
cycle and their accurate representation in atmospheric models is crucial. However, incorporating
moisture processes is difficult because cloud and precipitation physics is poorly understood, and
because the horizontal resolution of large-scale models is much larger than the scales at which
clouds are formed -- hence cloud-precipitation processes are subgrid-scale mechanisms which
must be parameterized.
2.2.3.2 Soil moisture processes
Within the climate system, near-surface soil moisture possesses a memory due to its seasonal
evolution, and is determined as the residual between precipitation on the one hand and
evaporation and surface and subsurface runoff on the other. Many of the modeling studies which
have provided evidence that seasonal predictions show sensitivity to hydrologic-atmospheric
coupling have in fact been framed in terms of sensitivity to modeled or prescribed soil moisture.
There is, therefore, a clear understanding of the importance of soil moisture for climate prediction
at the seasonal time scale.
a. Investigate potential new surface hydrological parameterizations.
b. Acquire test data sets (historical precipitation, streamflow, surface
meteorological observations and land surface characteristics) for a large
number of basins (at least 100) for model calibration and testing. These
data sets should be for long periods; at least 10 and preferably 50 years.
c. Calibrate model parameters.
d. Investigate relationship between model parameters and land surface
characteristics of the basins (topography, soils, vegetation, etc.).
e. Evaluate possible dependence of model parameters on climate.
f. Estimate model parameters using land surface properties (and climate
characteristics if needed).
g. Operate parameterization in off-line mode using GCM and observed data
to test performance over the GCIP study area.
h. Implement parameterization in Regional NWP Models and GCMs and
evaluate results.
2.2.3.3 Biospheric processes
Vegetation influences several aspects of the hydrological cycle. There is long-standing
evidence that vegetation cover affects catchment runoff. Foliage is known to exert active
biological control on transpiration by regulating the stomatal pores through which water vapor
leaves the plant. The morphology of plant canopies also influences the absorption of solar energy
and the generation of turbulence. These factors together influence the partitioning of available
energy into sensible heat and latent heat, and the heat flow into and out of the soil. The sensitivity
of stomata to soil moisture change is small at high soil moisture values, but it is ultimately a
strongly limiting control on transpiration flux at low soil moistures.
2.3 Improvements to regional mesoscale models
For the past four years there has been an extensive effort to acquire the model output from
several operational/experimental centers from a range of operational models of varying resolution,
physics and data assimilation systems. GCIP is concentrating on three regional mesoscale models
(IGPO, 1995):
The participation by the operational centers in providing regional model output for GCIP leads to
a mutually beneficial relationship. The principal benefit to GCIP is to provide a measure of the
inter-model variability of the outputs from the different regional models which can also be related
to the global model output from the operational centers. GCIP can provide benefit to the
operational centers by enabling them to make use of the enhanced data sets to calibrate and
validate the model data assimilation and forecast systems.
- Provide model assimilated and forecast data products for GCIP diagnostic studies
including energy and water budget studies.
The regional models now running operationally (NCEP/Eta and CMC/RFE) will be
upgraded with numerous improvements during the next several years. The GCIP investigators
need to be aware of these plans for improvements and the schedule being followed to incorporate
these improvements into the operational models. The experimental MAPS model will also be
upgraded during the next several years. Projected improvements to each of the regional models is
described in the remainder of this section.
- Test and validate components needed to develop a coupled hydrologic-atmospheric
climate model. For example, the regional mesoscale models can be
used to address the scientific question - To what extent is meteorological
prediction at daily time scales sensitive to hydrologic-atmospheric coupling
processes?
- Demonstrate the validity and performance characteristics of a coupled hydrologic -
atmospheric model during the assimilation and early prediction time periods as a
precursor to developing and testing a coupled hydrologic-atmospheric climate
model.
2.3.1 The NCEP Mesoscale Eta Model and Eta Data Assimilation System (EDAS)
Since April 1, 1995, output from the NCEP Eta model (Black, 1994) and its associated
Eta-based 4-D Data Assimilation System known as EDAS (Rogers, 1995) have been routinely
archived for GCIP. In conjunction with this milestone, NCEP implemented for GCIP an extensive
expansion of the routine ETA/EDAS output products, including a vast suite of surface and
near-surface products that encompass all the surface energy and water fluxes, soil moisture and
temperature, snowpack and snowmelt, and surface and subsurface runoff. These output products
include a) 3-hourly analysis and 6-hourly forecast horizontal gridded fields (known in GCIP as
MORDS) and b) hourly station time series output (known is GCIP as MOLTS) at nearly 300
sites. A number of GCIP investigators have completed and published initial Mississippi River
Basin water budget studies based on these Eta model GCIP archive products (Berbery et al.,
1996; Yarosh et al. 1996).
- Coupled land-surface/hydrology model
These three improvement areas have resulted in the following specific items implemented
in the ETA/EDAS system:
- 4DDA Assimilation techniques and data sources
- Explicit cloud physics for precipitation and radiation
- October 1995: Explicit microphysics for cloud water and ice was added, with attendant
improvements in the accuracy of precipitation and radiation (Zhao and Carr, 1996).
Following three years of NCEP/EMC focused effort as a key participant in the
NOAA-sponsored, land-surface related, GCIP project (in collaboration with the NWS Office of
Hydrology), EMC operationally implemented in January 1996 a new multi-layer soil/vegetation
scheme in the Eta model (see Secs 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 of Chen et. al. 1996a, also Chen et. al. 1996b).
This land-surface physics package includes two soil layers, time dependent soil moisture and
temperature, spatially varying vegetation and soil types, a seasonal vegetation cycle, snowpack
physics, and runoff. A related land-surface scheme was implemented in the NCEP/EMC global
model and its continuous global data assimilation system, which includes continuous cycling of
soil moisture and soil temperature. The Eta model soil moisture and soil temperature are
initialized from the latter global data assimilation system with improvements planned for a
continuous cycling as identified late in this section. The snowdepth is initialized from a
daily 47-km Northern Hemisphere Air Force snowdepth analysis.
Dynamics:
A 4-dimensional Variational Assimilation (4-D VAR) System is in advanced development
and testing, using the adjoint of the Eta model. The 4-D VAR methodology allows easier
incorporation of non-traditional data sources such as direct use of satellite radiances, cloud cover,
precipitation, radar reflectivities, profilers, WVSS, ACARS, and ASOS. The assimilation of one
to three hourly precipitation fields and satellite estimates of atmospheric water vapor has shown
significant promise in tests to date. The satellite water vapor estimates have included GOES 8/9,
SSM/I, and SSM/T2.
(a) - quasi Lagrangian advection of water vapor/cloud water
Physics:
(b) - non-hydrostatic numerics
(a) - improve land-surface scheme including increase from 2 to 4 soil layers, allow
non-uniform root distribution, upgrade snowpack and frozen soil physics, refine key hydraulic,
infiltration, and runoff parameters, refine vegetation and soils specification
Data Assimilation:
(b) - test alternative deep and shallow convection schemes, such as Kain-Fritsch to include
explicit treatment of the low-level cold outflow and convection initiation due to
downdrafts
(c)- upgrade the radiation scheme and its interaction with clouds, including reduction of
positive surface solar insolation bias
(a) - a continuously cycled 24-hour EDAS (including soil moisture)
(b) - assimilate NCEP hourly 4-km U.S. gage/radar precip analysis (should significantly
improve cycled soil moisture)
(c) - 3-D and 4-D variational assimilation
-- assimilate WSR-88D radar products (e.g. radial winds)
-- assimilate satellite radiances directly
2.3.2 Regional Model Upgrade at CMC
It is expected that the quality of the Regional Finite Element (RFE) model outputs will
improve significantly during the coming two or three years, especially in terms of the variables
that are important for the water and energy budgets which are of prime interest to GCIP.