FLAT90: Logbook Entries

FLAT90: BAROMETERS Messages: 8 Entries..

Return to Logbook Contents Page
Entry Date Title Site Author #Graphics
465 Fri 26-Oct-1990Replaced new barometer #0002 with #0001 nonetwh
474 Sat 27-Oct-1990New PAM barometer boards installed. nonespo
522 Thu 01-Nov-1990NEW BAROMETER - 4m nonesrs
524 Thu 01-Nov-1990NEW BAROMETERS nonesrs
552 Tue 06-Nov-1990New PAM barometers apparently stopped r nonetwh
561 Wed 07-Nov-1990New PAM barometers stopped again at ~12 nonetwh
565 Wed 07-Nov-1990Recycled power on new PAM barometers at nonetwh
639 Fri 16-Nov-1990Al was here! nonespo


465: BAROMETERS , Site none, Fri 26-Oct-1990 19:04:00 GMT, Replaced new barometer #0002 with #0001
Replaced new barometer #0002 with #0001 
at ~18:53.  Tony and I were at the towers 
from ~18:45 - ~19:00. 
 
 
474: BAROMETERS , Site none, Sat 27-Oct-1990 23:15:35 GMT, New PAM barometer boards installed.
New PAM barometer boards installed. 
 
See entry #472 for most details.  Here I wanted to mention that the tubing going 
down from the 7m port to the transducer at 4m was wrapped around one leg of the mast, 
so it should be relatively vibration-free.  Also, I am not sure which of the ports 
is which (and therefore which one is 7m).  The 7m port is connected to the transducer 
closest to the edge of the board. I'll look at the data to see which one this appears 
to be. 
 
 
522: BAROMETERS , Site none, Thu 01-Nov-1990 20:13:22 GMT, NEW BAROMETER - 4m
NEW BAROMETER - 4m 
 
	From 19:40 to 20:00 GMT, Steve and 
Cathy were at the ati tower trying to talk 
to the new barometer. All the cables checked out 
ok. The sensor was pulled from the box to be 
checked in the lab. Because of the tie connections 
from the old barometers to the new, pressure 
values at the 4m and 7m levels should be considered 
bad until the new barometer is reconnected. Look 
at future logbook messages stating when pressure 
data is good again. 
 
524: BAROMETERS , Site none, Thu 01-Nov-1990 21:39:50 GMT, NEW BAROMETERS
NEW BAROMETERS 
 
	The new barometers are now running 
at 1 sec. data rates. The 4m sensor was installed 
and looks good. This took place at 21:30 GMT. 
 
552: BAROMETERS , Site none, Tue 06-Nov-1990 01:06:55 GMT, New PAM barometers apparently stopped r
New PAM barometers apparently stopped running 
when marigold stopped at 21:39 on JD 308. 
Charlie restarted them by recycling their 
power at 00:45 JD 310. 
 
 
561: BAROMETERS , Site none, Wed 07-Nov-1990 01:33:49 GMT, New PAM barometers stopped again at ~12
New PAM barometers stopped again at ~12:38 
JD 310. 
 
 
565: BAROMETERS , Site none, Wed 07-Nov-1990 18:07:27 GMT, Recycled power on new PAM barometers at
Recycled power on new PAM barometers at 
16:16 in order to initiate archiving.   
Data are being archived, but the data  
file has JD 310 rather than JD 311: 
 
aster:/home/aster/raw_data>ls -l ati/pam_new.bar* 
248240 Nov  7 18:00 ati/pam_new.bar#310#16:16:25 
     0 Nov  7 18:00 ati/pam_new.bar#311#18:00:00 
 
I renamed the file pam_new.bar#310#16:16:25 to 
pam_new.bar#311#16:16:25. 
 
 
639: BAROMETERS , Site none, Fri 16-Nov-1990 19:51:49 GMT, Al was here!
Al was here!   
 
First test (~10:00 local) was to insert resisters (a dummy load) into Al's box at 4m - 
  this added about 480 microbars to the signal and had noise on the order 
  of 10^-9 (in power), which looked white. 
 
Next test (~10:30 local) was to insert dummy loads into the boxes at 7m and 13m.  Both 
  of these threw the balance offscale (<-5V), so Steve S. changed the jumpers on the  
  filter board to make a gain of 1/2 about 10 min. after the loads were inserted. 
  It was obvious from this test that the 4m had more noise, which looked like aliasing 
  of a high (>10 Hz) signal. 
   
Final test (~12:30 - after Al left) was to move the analog cable from the 4m box away 
  from all other cabling (including power).  The noise on the 4m signal is now much 
  less than the one at 7m.  WE SHOULD HAVE DONE THIS TEST LONG AGO!!!  Al thinks that 
  the noise is still low enough that it won't effect unstable data (or even stable 
  data in moderate (>3 m/s) winds), but it would have been nice.  Oh well...