These sensors are lighter than Epply PSP and PIRs and thus are preferred where weight is critical (such as on Arctic ice deployments). This also permits a lighter mounting structure to be used. Furthermore, results from EBEX suggest that the Kipp & Zonen sensors are more accurate than the Epplys and the CG4 has a smaller dome temperature correction than the PIR. Thus, we plan to utilize these sensors more in future deployments. Our CG4s do not have a Tdome sensor, so it is not possible to implement a dome heating correction. The CG4 manual states that the dome-case temperature difference is no more than 0.3C and would produce an error of less than 4 W/m^2. The manual also says that the CG4 does not need to be shaded from direct sun (the shortwave radiation correction). Data shown by H. Naganuuma (http://www.gewex.org/BSRN/BSRNagendafinal.htm) show the CG4 reading lower by 5 W/m^2 when shaded from full sun (f=~0.5%).